Detailed comparison of the Nikon D7500 with the Nikon D7200 cameras.

You don’t need a very strong ISO performance at 51,200, do you? Is it not necessary to have a comfortable body with a deep hand-grip? Does an LCD touch screen or flip screen display not meet your requirements? And you’re not interested in sports photography at 8 frames per second with incredible auto-focus tracking, are you? Well, here are all of the things that you will not find in the D7200, as well as a few extras.

Even though the D7200 was somewhat less expensive than the D7500 when it was first introduced, both cameras are in the same price range. Typically, retail prices remain close to the launch price for the first few months, but after a few months, reductions become available. Further discounting and stock clearing discounts are commonplace later in the product cycle, and particularly when the successor model is ready to be introduced. As a result, the camera price is often reduced by a significant amount. The Nikon D7200 and the Nikon D7500 are two enthusiast cameras that were introduced to the public, respectively, in March 2015 and April 2017, as part of the Nikon D7200 and Nikon D7500 series.

The highest possible resolution for videos taken with the primary camera. Although it may be possible to choose from a variety of different frame rates, the resulting recordings are often of inferior resolution. A quicker maximum shutter speed helps you to capture images of fast-moving subjects without the images becoming blurry.

As a result of the addition of an electronic front curtain shutter, the successor is less susceptible to undesirable vibrations induced by the shutter mechanism while making long exposures. A huge magnification of 0.94x is provided by the optical viewfinders on both cameras, which cover 100 percent of the screen. When it comes to the actual buttons on the cameras, they are almost similar to one another. The most significant modifications are, first and foremost, the replacement of the Metering button with a dedicated ISO button, which is a wonderful feature comparable to that of the D500. Second, the Depth of Field Preview button has been removed and has been replaced with an extra function button, FN1, as a replacement.

I’m getting rid of Nikon and the whole range of professional lenses that I’ve had for years. Nikon is a jerk who treats its devoted customers like fools by neglecting their most fundamental demands. They believe that they can either compel you to spend more money on a camera or allow you to live with a negative sensation about a camera that lacks a fundamental function at its level. You sound like a professional looking for a new professional camera for $1,250 or less. Nikon has provided you with such high-end professional quality in the D7500 that even if they had added a second card slot, you would not have purchased the professional class D500 camera.

Take part in our 30-Day Creative Eye Challenge and learn the long-forgotten techniques of snagging stunning photographs anywhere, at any time of day or night. As is true of many purchases, the ultimate selection is often influenced by the price. Furthermore, as previously said, the Nikon D7200 is less expensive whether it is purchased new or used. Perhaps the most compelling argument to purchase a D7500 rather than a D7200 is the fact that it is a newer camera with more up-to-date technological capabilities. A pre-owned D7200 in good shape can be had for a little over $700, while a pre-owned D7500 in like new condition would cost you a little less than $1,000.

Below is a side-by-side comparison of the technical specifications of the two cameras, which should help you quickly assess their differences and similarities. While both cameras are capable of capturing high-quality video, their autofocus systems depend on contrast detection in video mode, which is not the most reliable method of focusing, therefore manual focusing may be a preferable alternative in certain situations. The D7500’s Expeed 5 processing engine allows it to edge over the D7200 once again, this time by offering a maximum shooting rate of 8 frames per second rather than 6 frames per second. A larger buffer on the newer camera means that it can shoot at 8 frames per second for up to 50 uncompressed 14-bit raw files, while the D7200 can only manage 18 at its highest pace.

All deals are subject to availability and are only valid while supplies last. The Nikon D7500 incorporates several of the most appealing characteristics of the Nikon D500 into a more economical design. This technology enables users to operate their gadget from their smartphone, which they may access using a web browser. The addition of more microphones improves sound quality and allows the gadget to filter out background noise more effectively. Devices that are water resistant can withstand the passage of water, such as forceful water jets, however they should not be immersed in water.

The battery life of the D7200 is another aspect that immediately stands out to you. It also falls short of the D7500 in terms of video performance, because to its 1920×1080 video resolution and lower frame rate. The D7500 is compatible with Nikon’s F-mount lenses, thus there isn’t a scarcity of glass available for this camera.

In terms of battery life, the predecessor outperforms the successor, producing 1,110 shots per charge life compared to just 950 shots per charge life, a 13 percent loss. The reason for the switch is the newly built EN-15a battery, which has replaced the long-standing EN-EL15 battery. Due to the fact that phase-detection autofocus is substantially quicker than contrast detection autofocus, clearer photographs may be captured. When you use autofocus tracking, after you have chosen your subject and pressed the shutter release halfway down, the autofocus will follow your subject as it moves.

When this camera was first introduced, half of the internet speculated that the resolution had been lowered, which was not the case. If that’s the case, how is this sensor going to be a step forward over the D7200 when it has worse resolution and lower dynamic range while costing more money? In terms of performance, I couldn’t care less about a few additional frames per second or a tiny improvement in high ISO performance. Longer focal lengths in lenses would be preferable; nevertheless, the amount of movement and the size of the sensor’s picture area must both change at 600mm focal length. It would be fantastic if they could create a combination lens and body.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *